從先占原則論釣魚島的地位

法律論文編號:FG007  包括:開題報告,中英文摘要,論文,目錄,文獻綜述,任務書,答辯,中期檢查表,等    論文字數:8275,頁數:15         

目  錄
摘 要…………………………………………………………………………………………………… II
Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………………………III
前  言……………………………………………………………………………………………………1
一、先占原則的概述…………………………………………………………………………2
（一）先占的主體是國家…………………………………………………………………… 2
（二）先占對象是無主土地………………………………………………………………… 2
（三）先占需實行有效占領………………………………………………………………… 2
二、釣魚島適用“先占”原則的情況……………………………………………………3
（一）無主地的確認………………………………………………………………………… 3
1.中國的發現………………………………………………………………………………… 3
2.日本的發現………………………………………………………………………………… 4
（二）有效占有……………………………………………………………………………… 6
1.中國的有效占有…………………………………………………………………………… 6
2.日本所謂的有效占有……………………………………………………………………… 7
（三）釣魚島爭端的現狀…………………………………………………………………… 8
結  論………………………………………………………………………………………9
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………………………………10
致  謝………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11

摘　要
釣魚島自古以來就是中國的固有領土,但日本從上世紀60 年代末開始, 不斷對釣魚島提出主權要求并強行占領該島。自此,中國政府和全球華人以各種形式不斷抗議。在國際法中，合法取得領土的方式有多種，其中一種就是“先占”，即以取得國的名義并為該國而占有土地，且在該土地上建立行政管理，它需要滿足四個條件：先占的主題是國家;主觀方面有意思表示;客體是無主地;客觀方面是有效占有。本文旨在從國際公法里“先占”原則分析釣魚島的地位，說明釣魚島不是無主地、不屬于“先占”原則的客體，以及從中國和日本對釣魚島的實際利用情況分析兩國對釣魚島的有效占有，從而說明日本妄圖占有釣魚島的行為是毫無根據和行不通的，中國對釣魚島的擁有絕對主權。
關鍵詞：先占, 無主地，有效占有

Discuss the status of Diaoyu island from the first principle

Abstract
    Diaoyu island has been the territory of China from time immemorial,but from the end of last 60th, Japan put in a claim for Diaoyu island continuously and occupied it by force. From then on , Chinese government and ethnic Chinese person arroud golobe empressed their protest in every varity of form. In the international law,there are many legal way of getting territory , of which is “occupation” ，it means that occupied nation occupy territory in her name, and  set executive management in the territory.Occupation need four important document: first, main subject of occupation is country;second,the country must show its subjective mean;third.the object of occupation is impersonally;the last,the objective side is effectively occupy. The purpose of this essay is going to analysis the status of the Diaoyu Islands, which based on the 'occupation' of the international law, then illustrate that the Diaoyu Islands is neither the terra nullius, nor belongs to the objective of 'occupation'. Moreover, according to analyze the actual utilization of the effectively occupy in two countries that including China and Japan, we can find out that the action of Japan attempted to occupy the Diaoyu Islands is groundless and just won't work，China has the absolute sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands.
Key words: occupation; terra nullius; effectively occupy