犯罪客體在司法認定中的作用

法律論文編號:XF031  包括:開題報告,中英文摘要,論文,目錄,文獻綜述,任務書,答辯,中期檢查表,等   論文字數:12635,頁數:16

摘要 ...........................................................Ⅰ
Abstract     ...................................................Ⅱ
一、犯罪客體的含義 .............................................3
（一）從舊通說到新通說 .........................................3
（二）從社會關系論到非社會關系論............................... 4
1.對象說 .......................................................4
2.權利說 .......................................................4
3.法益說 .......................................................4

二、犯罪客體在犯罪構成中的地位................................. 5
（一）肯定說的主張 .............................................5
1.系統論 .......................................................5
2.相互依存論................................................... 6
3.綜合論....................................................... 7
（二）否定說的主張 .............................................7
1.理論歸屬錯誤 .................................................7
2.二要件說 .....................................................8
3. 三要件說.....................................................8
三、犯罪客體序位概述 ...........................................10
（一）通說的觀點 ...............................................10
（二）系統論的觀點 .............................................11
（三）行為科學論的觀點 .........................................11
四、犯罪客體在犯罪構成中的作用 .................................13
（一）犯罪客體具有規范評價作用 .................................13
（二）犯罪客體的出罪功能....................................... 13
（三）正確區分此罪與彼罪 .......................................13
（四）有助于正確量刑 ...........................................14
參考文獻 .......................................................15
致謝............................................................16

摘   要
     犯罪構成是刑法理論的核心，被看成是犯罪論的基石和基本內容，是各種犯罪事實中抽象出來的一般性的、普遍性的要件的總和，是解決犯罪事實的前提與基礎。而犯罪客體是否是犯罪構成的要件之一，一直是我國刑法理論界爭論不休的話題。對于什么是犯罪客體，有著許多不同的觀點與主張，比如“社會關系說”、“對象說”、“法益說”等等；此外對于犯罪客體有沒有存在的必要，有的學者否定犯罪客體作為犯罪構成要件，主張消滅犯罪客體，認為犯罪主觀要件、犯罪主體要件和犯罪客觀要件就已經完整構成了犯罪構成的所有要件，比如“二要件說”與“三要件說”。而有的學者則認為犯罪客體是犯罪構成的必備條件之一即我國現在的傳統理論通說。因此對于犯罪客體的準確定義定位，以及對犯罪客體存在價值的探討有助于我們正確地學習和認識犯罪構成理論。本文正是基于這樣一種觀念對犯罪客體作粗淺的探討。通過對各種觀點、學說的比較，深入地探討了犯罪客體的定義、地位、序位，論證地得出犯罪客體作為犯罪構成要件的必要性，最后進一步地說明了犯罪客體在犯罪構成要件中對司法認定的作用。

關鍵詞： 犯罪構成   犯罪客體       司法作用

Criminal justice that the object in the role of
Abstract
Crime is a core theory of criminal law, was seen as the cornerstone of a crime and the basic content of a variety of crimes in the abstract by the general, universal elements of the sum, is to address crime and the fact that the premise basis. The object of the crime is a crime one of the elements, has been a topic of debate in China The field of criminal law.What is the object of the crime, have many different views and ideas, such as "community relations", "targets", "Law said Yi," etc. In addition there are the object of crime no longer necessary, some scholars deny the object as a crime Elements of a crime, advocates the eradication of crime object that the subjective element of crime, criminal elements and the main objective elements of the crime constituted a crime has been a complete all the elements, such as "The Elements" and the "three elements of that." But some scholars believe that crime is the object of a crime that is the necessary condition for China is now one of the traditional theory Qualcomm said. So the object of a precise definition of criminal positioning, and the value of the object of the crime of the right to help us learn and understand a theory of crime. This article is based on a concept of crime as the object of superficial. Through the various viewpoints, theories of the comparison, in-depth study of the definition of the object of the crime, status, in sequence, and proof that crime as the object of a criminal element the need for further illustration of the final object of the crime in the elements constitute a crime That the role of the judiciary.

Keywords：  Constitute a crime   Crime Object   Judicial role