試論中國(guó)刑事和解制度的構(gòu)建

法律論文編號(hào):SS006   包括:開(kāi)題報(bào)告,中英文摘要,論文,目錄,文獻(xiàn)綜述,任務(wù)書(shū),答辯,中期檢查表,等   論文字?jǐn)?shù):9909,頁(yè)數(shù):17

目  錄
摘  要 ......................................................II
Abstract ....................................................III
前  言...................................................... 1
一、刑事和解的概念的分析.....................................1
(一)刑事和解的概念 ..........................................1
（二）刑事和解的特點(diǎn)........................................ 2
1．刑事和解的自主選擇性 .....................................2
2．刑事和解的緩和性 .........................................2
3．刑事和解的多贏性 .........................................2
（三）刑事和解與類似概念的比較.............................. 3
1．刑事和解與辯訴交易的區(qū)別 .................................3
2．刑事和解與調(diào)解的比較..................................... 3
二、刑事和解的可行性分析 ....................................3
(一)刑事和解的理論依據(jù) ......................................3
1.被害人與被告人主體地位的回歸 ..............................4
2.罪刑法定原則、罪行相適應(yīng)原則的絕對(duì)化向相對(duì)化的轉(zhuǎn)變........ 4
3.刑事和解是多方利益的契合 ..................................4
（二）刑事和解的現(xiàn)實(shí)依據(jù) ....................................5
1.“寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)”的刑事政策為刑事和解提供了現(xiàn)實(shí)依據(jù) ............5
2.刑事和解是提高司法效率的要求 ..............................5
3.刑事和解符合構(gòu)建社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)的內(nèi)在要求................ 6
三、關(guān)于構(gòu)建我國(guó)刑事和解制度的構(gòu)想 ..........................6
（一）構(gòu)建我國(guó)刑事和解制度的基本問(wèn)題分析 ....................6
1.適用條件.................................................. 6
2.適用范圍 ..................................................7
3.適用階段 ..................................................8
4.刑事和解的法律效力 ........................................9
（二）與刑事和解相應(yīng)的配套措施 ..............................9
1.擴(kuò)大檢察機(jī)關(guān)酌定不起訴的自由裁量權(quán) ........................9
2.完善刑事強(qiáng)制措施，擴(kuò)大非監(jiān)禁刑的適用 ......................9
3.改革刑事附帶民事訴訟制度 ..................................9
4.建立暫緩不起訴制度 ........................................10
5.國(guó)家建立被害人救助制度 ....................................10
6.建立有效的監(jiān)督機(jī)制 ........................................10
結(jié)語(yǔ) ........................................................10
參考文獻(xiàn) ....................................................12
致  謝 ......................................................13

摘   要
     刑事和解是被害人與加害人自愿進(jìn)行直接商談、協(xié)商解決刑事糾紛的一種機(jī)制。它作為刑事案件的一種新的解決方式，具有自主選擇的特點(diǎn)，能緩和雙方當(dāng)事人的矛盾，刑事和解協(xié)議的達(dá)成是被害人、加害人和社會(huì)的利益的平衡，具有多贏性的特點(diǎn)。刑事和解與美國(guó)的辯訴交易和傳統(tǒng)的調(diào)解相比較，有相似又有不同之處。被害人與被告人主體地位的回歸，罪刑法定原則、罪責(zé)刑相適應(yīng)原則絕對(duì)化向相對(duì)化的轉(zhuǎn)變，多方利益的契合為刑事和解的存在提供理論依據(jù)；刑事和解符合“寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)”刑事政策，符合提高刑事司法效率的要求，符合構(gòu)建社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)的需要?jiǎng)t為其存在提供現(xiàn)實(shí)依據(jù)。刑事和解制度的構(gòu)建要求對(duì)其適用條件、范圍、階段及和解協(xié)議的效力做出明確、原則性的規(guī)定，在我國(guó)，就是要相應(yīng)擴(kuò)大檢察官的自由裁量權(quán)，完善刑事強(qiáng)制措施，改革刑事附帶民事制度，建立暫緩不起訴制度，建立被害人國(guó)家救助制度，建立有效的監(jiān)督機(jī)制。

關(guān)鍵詞：刑事和解 理論依據(jù) 制度構(gòu)建

Abstract
Criminal reconciliation is a mechanism that the victim and the injure person are voluntary to confer and consult with the criminal dispute directly. Having advantages as independent selectivity, relaxing the contrary of persons concerned, and winning more, it has idem and difference to the plea bargain transaction adjustment. With the return to the dominant positions of the victim and the injure person, the permission in benefits in many sides, the principle of a Legally Prescribed Punishment for a specified Crime, the transform from absolute principle to relative principle in the criminal act to be in step with each other, it supplies logical proofs to criminal reconciliation and is in line with a socialist harmonious society’s construction, the “mutual aid or help in mercy and strictness” criminal policy and the request of improving criminal judicial efficiency.  Institution construction of criminal reconciliation is requested to define its suitable condition, range, stage, and the efficacy of reconciliation agreement having principle and clearly, and is needed to expand the control over administ rative discretion, to consummates criminal coercive measures warrants, to reform the institution of criminal in connection with civil code, to build a institution of reprieve no legal prosecution and a system of nation assist for the victim and a effective supervision mechanism.　

Key words: Criminal reconciliation; Logical proofs; Institution construction