論我國民事訴訟中的調(diào)解制度

法律論文編號:SS020   包括:開題報(bào)告,中英文摘要,論文,目錄,文獻(xiàn)綜述,任務(wù)書,答辯,中期檢查表,等   論文字?jǐn)?shù):11967,頁數(shù):21

摘    要
      我國現(xiàn)行的民事訴訟調(diào)解制度繼承和發(fā)揚(yáng)了傳統(tǒng)并不斷發(fā)展和完善，己經(jīng)成為頗具中國特色的社會主義法律制度之一。其體現(xiàn)出的追求和諧、秩序和穩(wěn)定的價值趨向?qū)τ诰S護(hù)社會穩(wěn)定，加強(qiáng)社會主義民主和法制建設(shè)，實(shí)現(xiàn)國家的長治久安發(fā)揮了巨大的作用，被西方國家贊譽(yù)為“東方經(jīng)驗(yàn)”。本文對我國民事訴訟中調(diào)解制度的研究，首先從調(diào)解制度的概念和性質(zhì)入手，然后回顧調(diào)解制度的歷史沿革，接著提出當(dāng)前的司法審判中調(diào)解制度存在的價值，正因其具有存在價值，才不能被削弱或者取消。而應(yīng)當(dāng)在在揭示現(xiàn)行調(diào)解制度存在弊端以及借鑒國外的相關(guān)制度的基礎(chǔ)上對其進(jìn)行改革和完善，同時就如何改革和完善提出建議和設(shè)想。最后從實(shí)踐的角度出發(fā)，提出自己的改革觀點(diǎn)，以期在保持法律的穩(wěn)定性和連續(xù)性與適應(yīng)社會和經(jīng)濟(jì)的迅速發(fā)展變化所產(chǎn)生的影響之間尋求最佳契合點(diǎn)和平衡點(diǎn)，從而樹立了法律的極大權(quán)威，推動我國依法治國進(jìn)程的順利進(jìn)行。

關(guān)鍵詞:調(diào)解制度 糾紛解決 調(diào)審分離 制度改革

On Mediation System of Civil Procedure in China

Abstract
The current mediation system of civil procedure in China inherited and developed the tradition and was further improved, which has been one of the law system of socialism with Chinese characteristics. It presents the value tendency of pursuing harmony, order and Stability which will play a great role in maintaining social stability, strengthening socialist democracy and legal system and realizing permanent stability of the nation. It is regarded as "the eastern experiences" by western country. Research on mediation system of civil procedure in China in this paper, firstly, starting with the basic concept and properties of mediation system; secondly, reviewing its historical evolution; thirdly, presenting its existing value in current judicial judgement, which should not be weaken or abolish as its existing value. We should reform and perfect the mediation system of civil procedure in China on the Basis of revealing its existing disadvantages and referring to relative systems abroad, meanwhile giving the suggestions and ideas for how to do it. At last, in order to searching the best consilience and balance between keeping the stability and the continuity of law and keeping up with the change of the social and economical development and its effects, we put forward our points of view of reforming mediation system of civil procedure in China in the view of practice, thus helping to build the authority of law and pushing the process of rule by law forward smoothly.

Key words: Mediation System, Dispute Resolution, Separation of Mediation and

目  錄

摘  要……………………………………………………………………………… Ⅰ
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………… Ⅱ
前  言…………………………………………………………………………………1
一、調(diào)解制度概述…………………………………………………………………… 2
（一）調(diào)解制度的概念和性質(zhì)……………………………………………………2
（二）調(diào)解制度的歷史沿革………………………………………………………2
（三）調(diào)解制度的存在價值………………………………………………………3
二、現(xiàn)行調(diào)解制度存在的弊端的分析………………………………………………5
（一）立法上的不完善……………………………………………………………5
查明事實(shí)、分清是非原則的誤區(qū)…………………………………………………5
2、法律規(guī)定上的漏洞造成了當(dāng)事人濫用反悔權(quán)……………………………………5
3、調(diào)解的監(jiān)督機(jī)構(gòu)不健全……………………………………………………………5
（二）實(shí)務(wù)中的缺陷………………………………………………………………6
1、自愿原則與司法強(qiáng)制性的矛盾……………………………………………………6
2、調(diào)解適用的范圍過寬………………………………………………………………6
三、我國民事調(diào)解制度與境外相關(guān)制度的比較借鑒………………………………7
（一）其他國家和地區(qū)的民事調(diào)解制度……………………………………………7
1、日本的民事調(diào)停……………………………………………………………………7
2、臺灣的訴前調(diào)停……………………………………………………………………7
3、美國的“附設(shè)在法院的調(diào)停(mediation)” ……………………………………7
（二）其他國家和地區(qū)的訴訟和解制度……………………………………………8
1、英、美兩國的訴訟和解制度………………………………………………………8
2、德、日和臺灣地區(qū)的訴訟和解制度………………………………………………8
3、法國的訴訟和解制度………………………………………………………………8
四、完善我國民事訴訟調(diào)解制度的構(gòu)想……………………………………………10
（一）調(diào)解原則的規(guī)制………………………………………………………………10
1、確立自愿原則為基本原則………………………………………………………10
2、對調(diào)解制度合法原則的重新解讀………………………………………………10
3、重新理解“在事實(shí)清楚的基礎(chǔ)上分清是非”的原則…………………………10
（二）構(gòu)建當(dāng)事人主義的調(diào)解制度…………………………………………………11
1．建立民事訴訟調(diào)解書面申請制度………………………………………………11
2．在民事調(diào)解過程中，置法官以中立、公正和消極的地位……………………11
（三）確定民事調(diào)解的范圍…………………………………………………………12
（四）完善對民事調(diào)解的審判監(jiān)督…………………………………………………13
結(jié)  論 ………………………………………………………………………………14
參考文獻(xiàn) ……………………………………………………………………………15  
致  謝 ………………16