論貪污罪的司法適用

法律v論文編號:XF022  包括:開題報告,中英文摘要,論文,目錄,文獻綜述,任務書,答辯,中期檢查表,等   論文字數:14996,頁數:21

目     錄
摘要…………………………………………………………………………  Ⅱ
ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………  Ⅲ
前言…………………………………………………………………………   1
一、關于貪污罪概念的界定………………………………………    1
（一）貪污罪概念定義……………………………………………………  1
（二）對貪污罪的概念定義的評析……………………………………… 1
二、貪污罪的犯罪對象的司法認定………………………………   2
（一）對國家參股或國有公司、企業參股的公司財物的認定……  2
（二）純私有財產可否視為貪污罪的犯罪對象………………………  4
三、貪污罪客觀方面的司法認定……………………………………  6
（一）.利用職務之便………………………………………………………  6
（二）.關于共犯的司法認定……………………………………………… 7
四、貪污罪主體的司法認定…………………………………………… 9
（一）國有性質的認定……………………………………………………… 9
（二）關于委派的認定…………………………………………………    11
（三）關于從事公務的認定……………………………………………… 13
五、結論……………………………………………………………………  14
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………… 15
致謝…………………………………………………………………………  16

摘    要
      貪污罪作為一種嚴重的職務犯罪行為，歷年來是國家統治階級為了協調統治關系，維護階級統治予以打擊的重點犯罪。今年是改革開放30周年，隨著改革的繼續深入，市場經濟體制的進一步發展，社會生活發生了翻天覆地的變化，實踐中出現多種新的貪污行為，給司法部門帶來了新的難題，在理論界引起了不少爭議，因此刑法學界對此進行了大量的研究。
關于犯罪對象的爭論主要集中在對國家參股或國有公司、企業參股的公司財物的認定。有的認為應該肯定其國有性質，有的則完全否定其國有性質。筆者認為肯定說有一定的合理性，應當堅持公有資本存在說。對私有財產的認定，有的學者完全否認其作為貪污罪的犯罪對象。而筆者則認為根據我國刑法的相關規定我們不應當把私有財產完全排除在外。對于“利用職務之便”，筆者認為，要弄清貪污罪中利用職務上的便利的真正含義，除從立法本身出發去追尋其立法原旨外，更重要的是以相關的司法解釋為依據。因此筆者認為貪污罪中的職務上的便利就是指行為人職務上的處理、處分或者控制公共財物職務行為的便利。關于共犯，筆者認為，對混合主體的共同貪污行為的定性應當考慮到其特殊性，還要兼顧我國現行刑法的特殊規定，即應當將“共同犯罪性質說”與“利用職務便利決定說”兩者結合起來。關于主體的認定特別是國有性質理論上有參股說、獨資說、控股說之爭，筆者認為相比較而言獨資說更合理些。筆者結合實際情況，根據我國刑法規定，對貪污罪的概念、犯罪對象、犯罪客觀方面等一系列疑難問題進行探討研究，提出對這些問題的個人看法，以期能解決司法實踐中對貪污罪若干情況的適用問題。
關鍵詞：貪污， 利用職務之便， 國家工作人員， 公共財物

The applicable of justice about the crime of corruption
Abstract
The crime of corruption is one kind of serious crime by taking advantage of duty behavior, over the years is the country ruling class to coordinate the relations of the rules , is a key crime which the class of rules attack. This year is the reform and open policy 30th anniversary, continues thoroughly along with the reform, market economy system's further development, social life had the earth-shaking change, in the practice there are many kinds of new corruptions, wich has brought the new difficult problem for the Judicial department, and has caused many disputes in the theorists.
 The controversy of the crime target mainly concentrated in  the state shares or state-owned companies, enterprises, the shares of companies that property. Some believe that the state should recognize its nature, while others are completely deny its state-owned properties. I think that certainly has some reasonable ,we should insist that public capital. On private property that, Some scholars completely denied the criminal offence of corruption as a target. And I think , according to the relevant provisions of China's Criminal Law , we should not be excluded completely private property. For "used his position to", in my view, to understand the true meaning of the crime of corruption in the use of his position to facilitate, we shoud make a use of the relevant judicial interpretation as the basis. Therefore, I believe that the crime of corruption in his position to facilitate ,wich the perpetrator positions on the treatment, and disposal of public property or control functions of convenience. About an accomplice, in my view,we shoud take into account its special nature,about the common characterization of acts of corruption of mixed main.we shoud Combine"Common criminal nature" and " decision about used his position to facilitate " together. On the subject of that,there are Shares, owned, and holding ,but comparatively speaking, I believe that a more reasonable that owned more.
 The author unifies the actual situation, according to our country criminal law, conducts the discussion research to the crime of corruption main body and the crime object and so on , proposed that individual views to these questions, by the time can solve the applicable of justice about the crime of corruption in the judicial practice .
Key Words:Crime of corruption ,  Used his position to,  public property, Country staff ,